Home › Flugelhorn › Bob Reeves 43W/HF vs Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E

Bob Reeves 43W/HF vs Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E

The Bob Reeves 43W/HF has a wider cup diameter, the Bob Reeves 43W/HF features a deeper cup.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
The internal diameter of the cup, measured at the widest point inside the rim.
Mouthpiece A
    Bob Reeves 43W/HF
    • Flugelhorn
    Cup diameter17.07 mm / 0.6720 in
    Best suited for
    🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E
      • Flugelhorn
      Catalog
      Cup diameter16.50 mm / 0.6496 in
      Best suited for
      ⚡Screamer / high notes — tight throat with shallow cup

      Cup Diameter

      The Bob Reeves 43W/HF has a cup diameter of 17.07 mm / 0.6720 in compared to 16.50 mm / 0.6496 in on the Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E — a difference of 0.57 mm / 0.0224 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bob Reeves 43W/HF details Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E details Bob Reeves 43W/HF equivalents Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E equivalents

      Compare Bob Reeves 43W/HF with others

      Compare Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E with others

      Popular Flugelhorn comparisons

      Bob Reeves vs Bruno Tilz

      Browse by specification