Bruno Tilz 210-C 42 vs Marcinkiewicz CH BSC FL

The Marcinkiewicz CH BSC FL has a wider cup diameter, the Bruno Tilz 210-C 42 features a deeper cup, the Bruno Tilz 210-C 42 has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
The narrowest point at the bottom of the cup. Affects resistance, volume, and tone color.
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 210-C 42
    • Flugelhorn
    Catalog
    Throat diameter4.50 mm / 0.1772 in
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Marcinkiewicz CH BSC FL
      • Flugelhorn
      Throat diameter4.39 mm / 0.1728 in
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Throat Diameter

      The Bruno Tilz 210-C 42 has a wider throat (4.50 mm / 0.1772 in vs 4.39 mm / 0.1728 in). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 210-C 42 details Marcinkiewicz CH BSC FL details Bruno Tilz 210-C 42 equivalents Marcinkiewicz CH BSC FL equivalents