Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 vs Denis Wick RW3FL

The Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 has a wider cup diameter, the Denis Wick RW3FL has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
The internal diameter of the cup, measured at the widest point inside the rim.
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 210-S 12
    • Flugelhorn
    Catalog
    Cup diameter17.00 mm / 0.6693 in
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Denis Wick RW3FL
      • Flugelhorn
      Cup diameter16.75 mm / 0.6594 in
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      The Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 has a cup diameter of 17.00 mm / 0.6693 in compared to 16.75 mm / 0.6594 in on the Denis Wick RW3FL — a difference of 0.25 mm / 0.0098 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 details Denis Wick RW3FL details Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 equivalents Denis Wick RW3FL equivalents