Home › Flugelhorn › Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 vs GR Technologies 66.5FL Almeida

Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 vs GR Technologies 66.5FL Almeida

The Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 has a wider cup diameter.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
The internal diameter of the cup, measured at the widest point inside the rim.
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 210-S 12
    • Flugelhorn
    Catalog
    Cup diameter17.00 mm / 0.6693 in
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      GR Technologies 66.5FL Almeida
      • Flugelhorn
      Cup diameter16.89 mm / 0.6650 in

      Cup Diameter

      The Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 has a cup diameter of 17.00 mm / 0.6693 in compared to 16.89 mm / 0.6650 in on the GR Technologies 66.5FL Almeida — a difference of 0.11 mm / 0.0043 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 details GR Technologies 66.5FL Almeida details Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 equivalents GR Technologies 66.5FL Almeida equivalents

      Compare Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 with others

      Compare GR Technologies 66.5FL Almeida with others

      Popular Flugelhorn comparisons

      Bruno Tilz vs GR Technologies

      Browse by specification