Home › Flugelhorn › Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 vs GR Technologies G66FD Radtke

Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 vs GR Technologies G66FD Radtke

The Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 has a wider cup diameter.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Surface plating or treatment (e.g. silver plate, gold trim). Affects feel, durability, and appearance.
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 210-S 12
    • Flugelhorn
    Catalog
    Finish—
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      GR Technologies G66FD Radtke
      • Flugelhorn
      Finish—

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 details GR Technologies G66FD Radtke details Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 equivalents GR Technologies G66FD Radtke equivalents

      Compare Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 with others

      Compare GR Technologies G66FD Radtke with others

      Popular Flugelhorn comparisons

      Bruno Tilz vs GR Technologies

      Browse by specification