Home › Flugelhorn › Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 vs Marcinkiewicz CH BS FL

Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 vs Marcinkiewicz CH BS FL

The Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 has a wider cup diameter, the Marcinkiewicz CH BS FL has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
The internal diameter of the cup, measured at the widest point inside the rim.
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 210-S 12
    • Flugelhorn
    Catalog
    Cup diameter17.00 mm / 0.6693 in
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Marcinkiewicz CH BS FL
      • Flugelhorn
      Cup diameter16.74 mm / 0.6591 in
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      The Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 has a cup diameter of 17.00 mm / 0.6693 in compared to 16.74 mm / 0.6591 in on the Marcinkiewicz CH BS FL — a difference of 0.26 mm / 0.0102 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 details Marcinkiewicz CH BS FL details Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 equivalents Marcinkiewicz CH BS FL equivalents

      Compare Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 with others

      Compare Marcinkiewicz CH BS FL with others

      Popular Flugelhorn comparisons

      Bruno Tilz vs Marcinkiewicz

      Browse by specification