Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E vs Denis Wick 2BFL
The Denis Wick 2BFL has a wider cup diameter, the Denis Wick 2BFL features a deeper cup, the Denis Wick 2BFL has a larger throat opening.
The internal diameter of the cup, measured at the widest point inside the rim.
Mouthpiece A
Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E
• Flugelhorn
CatalogCup diameter16.50 mm / 0.6496 in
Best suited for
Screamer / high notes — tight throat with shallow cup
vs
Mouthpiece B
Denis Wick 2BFL
• Flugelhorn
Cup diameter17.00 mm / 0.6693 in
Best suited for
Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
High-volume projection — open throat for power
Cup Diameter
The Denis Wick 2BFL has a cup diameter of 17.00 mm / 0.6693 in compared to 16.50 mm / 0.6496 in on the Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E — a difference of 0.50 mm / 0.0197 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.
Which is better?
Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.