Which has a bigger cup — Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E or Denis Wick 4F?

Both mouthpieces have virtually identical cup diameters at 16.50 mm / 0.6496 in.

How does cup depth compare between Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E and Denis Wick 4F?

The Denis Wick 4F has a very deep cup while the Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E has a shallow cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E vs Denis Wick 4F

Name: Denis Wick 4F
Brand: Denis Wick

the Denis Wick 4F features a deeper cup, the Denis Wick 4F has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material

Surface plating or treatment (e.g. silver plate, gold trim). Affects feel, durability, and appearance.

Mouthpiece A

Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E

• Flugelhorn

Catalog

Finish—

Best suited for

⚡Screamer / high notes — tight throat with shallow cup

Mouthpiece B

Denis Wick 4F

• Flugelhorn

Finish—

Best suited for

📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

Which is better?

Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E details Denis Wick 4F details Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E equivalents Denis Wick 4F equivalents

Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E vs Denis Wick 4F

Playing Characteristics

What Do These Model Names Mean?

What Changes If You Switch?

Which is better?

Compare Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E with others

Compare Denis Wick 4F with others

Popular Flugelhorn comparisons

Bruno Tilz vs Denis Wick

Browse by specification