Home › Flugelhorn › Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E vs Denis Wick 4FL

Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E vs Denis Wick 4FL

the Denis Wick 4FL features a deeper cup, the Denis Wick 4FL has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
The internal diameter of the cup, measured at the widest point inside the rim.
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E
    • Flugelhorn
    Catalog
    Cup diameter16.50 mm / 0.6496 in
    Best suited for
    ⚡Screamer / high notes — tight throat with shallow cup
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Denis Wick 4FL
      • Flugelhorn
      Cup diameter16.50 mm / 0.6496 in
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      Both mouthpieces have virtually identical cup diameters at 16.50 mm / 0.6496 in.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E details Denis Wick 4FL details Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E equivalents Denis Wick 4FL equivalents

      Compare Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E with others

      Compare Denis Wick 4FL with others

      Popular Flugelhorn comparisons

      Bruno Tilz vs Denis Wick

      Browse by specification