Home › Flugelhorn › Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E vs Denis Wick 5BFL

Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E vs Denis Wick 5BFL

The Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E has a wider cup diameter, the Denis Wick 5BFL features a deeper cup, the Denis Wick 5BFL has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
The internal diameter of the cup, measured at the widest point inside the rim.
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E
    • Flugelhorn
    Catalog
    Cup diameter16.50 mm / 0.6496 in
    Best suited for
    ⚡Screamer / high notes — tight throat with shallow cup
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Denis Wick 5BFL
      • Flugelhorn
      Cup diameter16.00 mm / 0.6299 in
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      The Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E has a cup diameter of 16.50 mm / 0.6496 in compared to 16.00 mm / 0.6299 in on the Denis Wick 5BFL — a difference of 0.50 mm / 0.0197 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E details Denis Wick 5BFL details Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E equivalents Denis Wick 5BFL equivalents

      Compare Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E with others

      Compare Denis Wick 5BFL with others

      Popular Flugelhorn comparisons

      Bruno Tilz vs Denis Wick

      Browse by specification