Home › Flugelhorn › Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E vs GR Technologies 66.5FL Almeida

Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E vs GR Technologies 66.5FL Almeida

The GR Technologies 66.5FL Almeida has a wider cup diameter, the GR Technologies 66.5FL Almeida features a deeper cup.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
How deep the cup is, from shallow (brighter, easier high register) to deep (darker, fuller sound).
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E
    • Flugelhorn
    Catalog
    Cup depthShallow
    Best suited for
    ⚡Screamer / high notes — tight throat with shallow cup
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      GR Technologies 66.5FL Almeida
      • Flugelhorn
      Cup depthMedium

      Cup Depth

      The GR Technologies 66.5FL Almeida has a medium cup while the Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E has a shallow cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E details GR Technologies 66.5FL Almeida details Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E equivalents GR Technologies 66.5FL Almeida equivalents

      Compare Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E with others

      Compare GR Technologies 66.5FL Almeida with others

      Popular Flugelhorn comparisons

      Bruno Tilz vs GR Technologies

      Browse by specification