Home › Flugelhorn › Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E vs GR Technologies 66.5FL Almeida

Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E vs GR Technologies 66.5FL Almeida

The GR Technologies 66.5FL Almeida has a wider cup diameter, the GR Technologies 66.5FL Almeida features a deeper cup.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
The narrowest point at the bottom of the cup. Affects resistance, volume, and tone color.
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E
    • Flugelhorn
    Catalog
    Throat diameter3.50 mm / 0.1378 in
    Best suited for
    ⚡Screamer / high notes — tight throat with shallow cup
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      GR Technologies 66.5FL Almeida
      • Flugelhorn
      Throat diameter—

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E details GR Technologies 66.5FL Almeida details Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E equivalents GR Technologies 66.5FL Almeida equivalents

      Compare Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E with others

      Compare GR Technologies 66.5FL Almeida with others

      Popular Flugelhorn comparisons

      Bruno Tilz vs GR Technologies

      Browse by specification