Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E vs GR Technologies G66FD Radtke

The GR Technologies G66FD Radtke has a wider cup diameter, the GR Technologies G66FD Radtke features a deeper cup.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
How deep the cup is, from shallow (brighter, easier high register) to deep (darker, fuller sound).
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E
    • Flugelhorn
    Catalog
    Cup depthShallow
    Best suited for
    Screamer / high notes — tight throat with shallow cup
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      GR Technologies G66FD Radtke
      • Flugelhorn
      Cup depthDeep

      Cup Depth

      The GR Technologies G66FD Radtke has a deep cup while the Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E has a shallow cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E details GR Technologies G66FD Radtke details Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E equivalents GR Technologies G66FD Radtke equivalents