Home › Flugelhorn › Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E vs GR Technologies 67FD

Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E vs GR Technologies 67FD

The GR Technologies 67FD has a wider cup diameter, the GR Technologies 67FD features a deeper cup.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
The taper behind the throat leading to the shank. Affects projection and tone character.
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E
    • Flugelhorn
    Catalog
    Backbore—
    Best suited for
    ⚡Screamer / high notes — tight throat with shallow cup
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      GR Technologies 67FD
      • Flugelhorn
      Backbore—
      Best suited for
      🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E details GR Technologies 67FD details Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E equivalents GR Technologies 67FD equivalents

      Compare Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E with others

      Compare GR Technologies 67FD with others

      Popular Flugelhorn comparisons

      Bruno Tilz vs GR Technologies

      Browse by specification