Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E vs Marcinkiewicz CH BSC FL

The Marcinkiewicz CH BSC FL has a wider cup diameter, the Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E features a deeper cup, the Marcinkiewicz CH BSC FL has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
How deep the cup is, from shallow (brighter, easier high register) to deep (darker, fuller sound).
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E
    • Flugelhorn
    Catalog
    Cup depthShallow
    Best suited for
    Screamer / high notes — tight throat with shallow cup
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Marcinkiewicz CH BSC FL
      • Flugelhorn
      Cup depthVery shallow
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Depth

      The Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E has a shallow cup while the Marcinkiewicz CH BSC FL has a very shallow cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E details Marcinkiewicz CH BSC FL details Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E equivalents Marcinkiewicz CH BSC FL equivalents