Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E vs Marcinkiewicz CH E3.1FLJWM

The Marcinkiewicz CH E3.1FLJWM has a wider cup diameter, the Marcinkiewicz CH E3.1FLJWM features a deeper cup, the Marcinkiewicz CH E3.1FLJWM has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Base metal or construction (e.g. brass, stainless steel, plastic). Influences weight, response, and tone color.
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E
    • Flugelhorn
    Catalog
    Material
    Best suited for
    Screamer / high notes — tight throat with shallow cup
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Marcinkiewicz CH E3.1FLJWM
      • Flugelhorn
      Material
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E details Marcinkiewicz CH E3.1FLJWM details Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E equivalents Marcinkiewicz CH E3.1FLJWM equivalents