Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E vs Schilke 20F

The Schilke 20F has a wider cup diameter, the Schilke 20F features a deeper cup, the Schilke 20F has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
The internal diameter of the cup, measured at the widest point inside the rim.
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E
    • Flugelhorn
    Catalog
    Cup diameter16.50 mm / 0.6496 in
    Best suited for
    Screamer / high notes — tight throat with shallow cup
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Schilke 20F
      • Flugelhorn
      Cup diameter17.78 mm / 0.7000 in
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      The Schilke 20F has a cup diameter of 17.78 mm / 0.7000 in compared to 16.50 mm / 0.6496 in on the Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E — a difference of 1.28 mm / 0.0504 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E details Schilke 20F details Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E equivalents Schilke 20F equivalents