Which has a bigger cup — Bruno Tilz 211-58 or Schilke 30C2?

The Schilke 30C2 has a cup diameter of 17.03 mm compared to 17.00 mm on the Bruno Tilz 211-58 — a difference of +0.03 mm. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

How does cup depth compare between Bruno Tilz 211-58 and Schilke 30C2?

Both mouthpieces share a medium cup depth, so the sound character from depth alone will be very similar.

Bruno Tilz 211-58 vs Schilke 30C2

The Schilke 30C2 has a wider cup diameter, the Bruno Tilz 211-58 has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material

Base metal or construction (e.g. brass, stainless steel, plastic). Influences weight, response, and tone color.

Mouthpiece A

Bruno Tilz 211-58

• French Horn

Catalog

Material—

Best suited for

📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

Mouthpiece B

Schilke 30C2

• French Horn

Material—

Which is better?

Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 211-58 details Schilke 30C2 details Bruno Tilz 211-58 equivalents Schilke 30C2 equivalents

Bruno Tilz 211-58 vs Schilke 30C2

Playing Characteristics

What Do These Model Names Mean?

What Changes If You Switch?

Which is better?

Compare Bruno Tilz 211-58 with others

Compare Schilke 30C2 with others

Popular French Horn comparisons

Bruno Tilz vs Schilke

Browse by specification