Which has a bigger cup — Bruno Tilz 211-C 2 or Schilke 30C2?

The Schilke 30C2 has a cup diameter of 17.03 mm / 0.6705 in compared to 16.50 mm / 0.6496 in on the Bruno Tilz 211-C 2 — a difference of 0.53 mm / 0.0209 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

How does cup depth compare between Bruno Tilz 211-C 2 and Schilke 30C2?

Both mouthpieces share a medium cup depth, so the sound character from depth alone will be very similar.

Bruno Tilz 211-C 2 vs Schilke 30C2

Name: Schilke 30C2
Brand: Schilke

The Schilke 30C2 has a wider cup diameter, the Bruno Tilz 211-C 2 has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material

The width of the rim surface that contacts the lips. Wider rims improve endurance; narrower rims improve flexibility.

Mouthpiece A

Bruno Tilz 211-C 2

• French Horn

Catalog

Rim width—

Best suited for

🎵All-round versatile — balanced cup for general playing

Mouthpiece B

Schilke 30C2

• French Horn

Rim width—

Which is better?

Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 211-C 2 details Schilke 30C2 details Bruno Tilz 211-C 2 equivalents Schilke 30C2 equivalents

Bruno Tilz 211-C 2 vs Schilke 30C2

Playing Characteristics

What Do These Model Names Mean?

What Changes If You Switch?

Which is better?

Compare Bruno Tilz 211-C 2 with others

Compare Schilke 30C2 with others

Popular French Horn comparisons

Bruno Tilz vs Schilke

Browse by specification