Bruno Tilz 213- A 2 vs Denis Wick SM3.5

The Denis Wick SM3.5 has a wider cup diameter, the Denis Wick SM3.5 features a deeper cup, the Denis Wick SM3.5 has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
The internal diameter of the cup, measured at the widest point inside the rim.
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 213- A 2
    • Baritone / Euphonium
    Catalog
    Cup diameter23.00 mm / 0.9055 in
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Denis Wick SM3.5
      • Baritone / Euphonium
      Cup diameter26.40 mm / 1.0394 in
      Best suited for
      🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      The Denis Wick SM3.5 has a cup diameter of 26.40 mm / 1.0394 in compared to 23.00 mm / 0.9055 in on the Bruno Tilz 213- A 2 — a difference of 3.40 mm / 0.1339 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 213- A 2 details Denis Wick SM3.5 details Bruno Tilz 213- A 2 equivalents Denis Wick SM3.5 equivalents