Bruno Tilz 231-C 4 vs Marcinkiewicz CH ETU1

The Marcinkiewicz CH ETU1 has a wider cup diameter, the Bruno Tilz 231-C 4 features a deeper cup, the Bruno Tilz 231-C 4 has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
The narrowest point at the bottom of the cup. Affects resistance, volume, and tone color.
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 231-C 4
    • Tuba
    Catalog
    Throat diameter8.20 mm / 0.3228 in
    Best suited for
    🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Marcinkiewicz CH ETU1
      • Tuba
      Throat diameter8.03 mm / 0.3161 in
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Throat Diameter

      The Bruno Tilz 231-C 4 has a wider throat (8.20 mm / 0.3228 in vs 8.03 mm / 0.3161 in). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 231-C 4 details Marcinkiewicz CH ETU1 details Bruno Tilz 231-C 4 equivalents Marcinkiewicz CH ETU1 equivalents