Bruno Tilz 231-C 4 vs Marcinkiewicz ETU1J. Self

The Marcinkiewicz ETU1J. Self has a wider cup diameter, the Bruno Tilz 231-C 4 features a deeper cup, the Bruno Tilz 231-C 4 has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
The internal diameter of the cup, measured at the widest point inside the rim.
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 231-C 4
    • Tuba
    Catalog
    Cup diameter33.00 mm / 1.2992 in
    Best suited for
    🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Marcinkiewicz ETU1J. Self
      • Tuba
      Cup diameter33.15 mm / 1.3051 in
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      The Marcinkiewicz ETU1J. Self has a cup diameter of 33.15 mm / 1.3051 in compared to 33.00 mm / 1.2992 in on the Bruno Tilz 231-C 4 — a difference of 0.15 mm / 0.0059 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 231-C 4 details Marcinkiewicz ETU1J. Self details Bruno Tilz 231-C 4 equivalents Marcinkiewicz ETU1J. Self equivalents