Bruno Tilz 310-M 12 vs Denis Wick 2L

The Bruno Tilz 310-M 12 has a wider cup diameter, the Denis Wick 2L features a deeper cup, the Denis Wick 2L has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
The internal diameter of the cup, measured at the widest point inside the rim.
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 310-M 12
    • Tuba
    Catalog
    Cup diameter32.50 mm / 1.2795 in
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Denis Wick 2L
      • Tuba
      Cup diameter32.00 mm / 1.2598 in
      Best suited for
      🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      The Bruno Tilz 310-M 12 has a cup diameter of 32.50 mm / 1.2795 in compared to 32.00 mm / 1.2598 in on the Denis Wick 2L — a difference of 0.50 mm / 0.0197 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 310-M 12 details Denis Wick 2L details Bruno Tilz 310-M 12 equivalents Denis Wick 2L equivalents