Which has a bigger cup — Bruno Tilz 310-M 18 or Schilke S-H?

The Schilke S-H has a cup diameter of 31.84 mm / 1.2535 in compared to 31.50 mm / 1.2402 in on the Bruno Tilz 310-M 18 — a difference of 0.34 mm / 0.0134 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

How does cup depth compare between Bruno Tilz 310-M 18 and Schilke S-H?

Both mouthpieces share a medium cup depth, so the sound character from depth alone will be very similar.

Bruno Tilz 310-M 18 vs Schilke S-H

Name: Schilke S-H
Brand: Schilke

The Schilke S-H has a wider cup diameter, the Bruno Tilz 310-M 18 has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material

Surface plating or treatment (e.g. silver plate, gold trim). Affects feel, durability, and appearance.

Mouthpiece A

Bruno Tilz 310-M 18

• Tuba

Catalog

Finish—

Best suited for

📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

Mouthpiece B

Schilke S-H

• Tuba

Finish—

Best suited for

📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

Which is better?

Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 310-M 18 details Schilke S-H details Bruno Tilz 310-M 18 equivalents Schilke S-H equivalents

Bruno Tilz 310-M 18 vs Schilke S-H

Playing Characteristics

What Do These Model Names Mean?

What Changes If You Switch?

Which is better?

Compare Bruno Tilz 310-M 18 with others

Compare Schilke S-H with others

Popular Tuba comparisons

Bruno Tilz vs Schilke

Browse by specification