Bruno Tilz 310-M 22 vs Marcinkiewicz CH ETU1

The Marcinkiewicz CH ETU1 has a wider cup diameter, the Bruno Tilz 310-M 22 has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
How deep the cup is, from shallow (brighter, easier high register) to deep (darker, fuller sound).
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 310-M 22
    • Tuba
    Catalog
    Cup depthMedium
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Marcinkiewicz CH ETU1
      • Tuba
      Cup depthMedium
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Depth

      Both mouthpieces share a medium cup depth, so the sound character from depth alone will be very similar.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 310-M 22 details Marcinkiewicz CH ETU1 details Bruno Tilz 310-M 22 equivalents Marcinkiewicz CH ETU1 equivalents