Which has a bigger cup — Bruno Tilz 310-M 22 or Marcinkiewicz ETU1J. Self?

The Marcinkiewicz ETU1J. Self has a cup diameter of 33.15 mm / 1.3051 in compared to 33.00 mm / 1.2992 in on the Bruno Tilz 310-M 22 — a difference of 0.15 mm / 0.0059 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

How does cup depth compare between Bruno Tilz 310-M 22 and Marcinkiewicz ETU1J. Self?

Both mouthpieces share a medium cup depth, so the sound character from depth alone will be very similar.

Bruno Tilz 310-M 22 vs Marcinkiewicz ETU1J. Self

Name: Marcinkiewicz ETU1J. Self
Brand: Marcinkiewicz

The Marcinkiewicz ETU1J. Self has a wider cup diameter, the Bruno Tilz 310-M 22 has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material

Base metal or construction (e.g. brass, stainless steel, plastic). Influences weight, response, and tone color.

Mouthpiece A

Bruno Tilz 310-M 22

• Tuba

Catalog

Material—

Best suited for

📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

Mouthpiece B

Marcinkiewicz ETU1J. Self

• Tuba

Material—

Best suited for

📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

Which is better?

Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 310-M 22 details Marcinkiewicz ETU1J. Self details Bruno Tilz 310-M 22 equivalents Marcinkiewicz ETU1J. Self equivalents

Bruno Tilz 310-M 22 vs Marcinkiewicz ETU1J. Self

Playing Characteristics

What Do These Model Names Mean?

What Changes If You Switch?

Which is better?

Compare Bruno Tilz 310-M 22 with others

Compare Marcinkiewicz ETU1J. Self with others

Popular Tuba comparisons

Bruno Tilz vs Marcinkiewicz

Browse by specification