Bruno Tilz 310-M 22 vs Marcinkiewicz ETU1J. Self

The Marcinkiewicz ETU1J. Self has a wider cup diameter, the Bruno Tilz 310-M 22 has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
The narrowest point at the bottom of the cup. Affects resistance, volume, and tone color.
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 310-M 22
    • Tuba
    Catalog
    Throat diameter8.30 mm / 0.3268 in
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Marcinkiewicz ETU1J. Self
      • Tuba
      Throat diameter8.03 mm / 0.3161 in
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Throat Diameter

      The Bruno Tilz 310-M 22 has a wider throat (8.30 mm / 0.3268 in vs 8.03 mm / 0.3161 in). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 310-M 22 details Marcinkiewicz ETU1J. Self details Bruno Tilz 310-M 22 equivalents Marcinkiewicz ETU1J. Self equivalents