Bruno Tilz 310-M 27 vs Denis Wick 2L

The Bruno Tilz 310-M 27 has a wider cup diameter, the Denis Wick 2L features a deeper cup, the Denis Wick 2L has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
How deep the cup is, from shallow (brighter, easier high register) to deep (darker, fuller sound).
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 310-M 27
    • Tuba
    Catalog
    Cup depthDeep
    Best suited for
    🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Denis Wick 2L
      • Tuba
      Cup depthVery deep
      Best suited for
      🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Depth

      The Denis Wick 2L has a very deep cup while the Bruno Tilz 310-M 27 has a deep cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 310-M 27 details Denis Wick 2L details Bruno Tilz 310-M 27 equivalents Denis Wick 2L equivalents