Bruno Tilz 310-M 27 vs Marcinkiewicz CH 18

The Bruno Tilz 310-M 27 has a wider cup diameter.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
How deep the cup is, from shallow (brighter, easier high register) to deep (darker, fuller sound).
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 310-M 27
    • Tuba
    Catalog
    Cup depthDeep
    Best suited for
    🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Marcinkiewicz CH 18
      • Tuba
      Cup depthDeep
      Best suited for
      🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Depth

      Both mouthpieces share a deep cup depth, so the sound character from depth alone will be very similar.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 310-M 27 details Marcinkiewicz CH 18 details Bruno Tilz 310-M 27 equivalents Marcinkiewicz CH 18 equivalents