Bruno Tilz 310-M 28 vs Marcinkiewicz CH H2

The Marcinkiewicz CH H2 has a wider cup diameter, the Bruno Tilz 310-M 28 features a deeper cup, the Marcinkiewicz CH H2 has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
How deep the cup is, from shallow (brighter, easier high register) to deep (darker, fuller sound).
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 310-M 28
    • Tuba
    Catalog
    Cup depthDeep
    Best suited for
    🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Marcinkiewicz CH H2
      • Tuba
      Cup depthShallow
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Depth

      The Bruno Tilz 310-M 28 has a deep cup while the Marcinkiewicz CH H2 has a shallow cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 310-M 28 details Marcinkiewicz CH H2 details Bruno Tilz 310-M 28 equivalents Marcinkiewicz CH H2 equivalents