Bruno Tilz 310-M 28 vs Marcinkiewicz CH H2

The Marcinkiewicz CH H2 has a wider cup diameter, the Bruno Tilz 310-M 28 features a deeper cup, the Marcinkiewicz CH H2 has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
The internal diameter of the cup, measured at the widest point inside the rim.
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 310-M 28
    • Tuba
    Catalog
    Cup diameter33.50 mm / 1.3189 in
    Best suited for
    🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Marcinkiewicz CH H2
      • Tuba
      Cup diameter33.60 mm / 1.3228 in
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      The Marcinkiewicz CH H2 has a cup diameter of 33.60 mm / 1.3228 in compared to 33.50 mm / 1.3189 in on the Bruno Tilz 310-M 28 — a difference of 0.10 mm / 0.0039 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 310-M 28 details Marcinkiewicz CH H2 details Bruno Tilz 310-M 28 equivalents Marcinkiewicz CH H2 equivalents