Bruno Tilz 310-M 28 vs Marcinkiewicz CH H2

The Marcinkiewicz CH H2 has a wider cup diameter, the Bruno Tilz 310-M 28 features a deeper cup, the Marcinkiewicz CH H2 has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
The narrowest point at the bottom of the cup. Affects resistance, volume, and tone color.
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 310-M 28
    • Tuba
    Catalog
    Throat diameter8.30 mm / 0.3268 in
    Best suited for
    🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Marcinkiewicz CH H2
      • Tuba
      Throat diameter8.33 mm / 0.3280 in
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Throat Diameter

      The Marcinkiewicz CH H2 has a wider throat (8.33 mm / 0.3280 in vs 8.30 mm / 0.3268 in). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 310-M 28 details Marcinkiewicz CH H2 details Bruno Tilz 310-M 28 equivalents Marcinkiewicz CH H2 equivalents