Bruno Tilz 231-C 4 vs Denis Wick 1

The Bruno Tilz 231-C 4 has a wider cup diameter, the Denis Wick 1 features a deeper cup, the Denis Wick 1 has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 231-C 4
    • Tuba
    Catalog
    Cup diameter33.00 mm
    Cup depthDeep
    Rim width
    Throat diameter8.20 mm
    Backbore
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Denis Wick 1
      • Tuba
      Cup diameter32.50 mm
      Cup depthVery deep
      Rim width7.48 mm
      Throat diameter8.43 mm
      Backboreopen
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      The Bruno Tilz 231-C 4 has a cup diameter of 33.00 mm compared to 32.50 mm on the Denis Wick 1 — a difference of +0.50 mm. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      The Denis Wick 1 has a very deep cup while the Bruno Tilz 231-C 4 has a deep cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Throat Diameter

      The Denis Wick 1 has a wider throat (8.43 mm vs 8.20 mm). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 231-C 4 details Denis Wick 1 details Bruno Tilz 231-C 4 equivalents Denis Wick 1 equivalents