Denis Wick 2.5CC vs Schilke 67

The Schilke 67 has a wider cup diameter, the Denis Wick 2.5CC features a deeper cup, the Denis Wick 2.5CC has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
How deep the cup is, from shallow (brighter, easier high register) to deep (darker, fuller sound).
Mouthpiece A
    Denis Wick 2.5CC
    • Tuba
    Cup depthDeep
    Best suited for
    🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Schilke 67
      • Tuba
      Cup depthMedium
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Depth

      The Denis Wick 2.5CC has a deep cup while the Schilke 67 has a medium cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Denis Wick 2.5CC details Schilke 67 details Denis Wick 2.5CC equivalents Schilke 67 equivalents