Denis Wick RW3FL vs GR Technologies 67FD

The GR Technologies 67FD has a wider cup diameter, the Denis Wick RW3FL features a deeper cup.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
The internal diameter of the cup, measured at the widest point inside the rim.
Mouthpiece A
    Denis Wick RW3FL
    • Flugelhorn
    Cup diameter16.75 mm / 0.6594 in
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      GR Technologies 67FD
      • Flugelhorn
      Cup diameter17.00 mm / 0.6693 in
      Best suited for
      🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone

      Cup Diameter

      The GR Technologies 67FD has a cup diameter of 17.00 mm / 0.6693 in compared to 16.75 mm / 0.6594 in on the Denis Wick RW3FL — a difference of 0.25 mm / 0.0098 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Denis Wick RW3FL details GR Technologies 67FD details Denis Wick RW3FL equivalents GR Technologies 67FD equivalents