Bruno Tilz 210-F 23 vs Denis Wick RW4FL
the Denis Wick RW4FL features a deeper cup, the Denis Wick RW4FL has a larger throat opening.
Mouthpiece A
Bruno Tilz 210-F 23
• Flugelhorn
CatalogCup diameter16.50 mm
Cup depthDeep
Rim width—
Throat diameter4.50 mm
Backbore—
Finish—
Material—
Best suited for
High-volume projection — open throat for power
vs
Mouthpiece B
Denis Wick RW4FL
• Flugelhorn
Cup diameter16.50 mm
Cup depthVery deep
Rim width5.27 mm
Throat diameter4.58 mm
Backboreopen
Finish—
Material—
Best suited for
High-volume projection — open throat for power
Cup Diameter
Both mouthpieces have virtually identical cup diameters at 16.50 mm.
Cup Depth
The Denis Wick RW4FL has a very deep cup while the Bruno Tilz 210-F 23 has a deep cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.
Throat Diameter
The Denis Wick RW4FL has a wider throat (4.58 mm vs 4.50 mm). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.
Which is better?
Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.