Denis Wick SFL vs GR Technologies 67FD

The GR Technologies 67FD has a wider cup diameter, the GR Technologies 67FD features a deeper cup.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
How deep the cup is, from shallow (brighter, easier high register) to deep (darker, fuller sound).
Mouthpiece A
    Denis Wick SFL
    • Flugelhorn
    Cup depthMedium
    Best suited for
    🎵All-round versatile — balanced cup for general playing
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      GR Technologies 67FD
      • Flugelhorn
      Cup depthDeep
      Best suited for
      🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone

      Cup Depth

      The GR Technologies 67FD has a deep cup while the Denis Wick SFL has a medium cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Denis Wick SFL details GR Technologies 67FD details Denis Wick SFL equivalents GR Technologies 67FD equivalents