Which has a bigger cup — Marcinkiewicz CH W1 or Schilke S-H?

The Marcinkiewicz CH W1 has a cup diameter of 33.66 mm / 1.3252 in compared to 31.84 mm / 1.2535 in on the Schilke S-H — a difference of 1.82 mm / 0.0717 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

How does cup depth compare between Marcinkiewicz CH W1 and Schilke S-H?

Both mouthpieces share a medium cup depth, so the sound character from depth alone will be very similar.

Marcinkiewicz CH W1 vs Schilke S-H

Name: Schilke S-H
Brand: Schilke

The Marcinkiewicz CH W1 has a wider cup diameter, the Marcinkiewicz CH W1 has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material

Surface plating or treatment (e.g. silver plate, gold trim). Affects feel, durability, and appearance.

Mouthpiece A

Marcinkiewicz CH W1

• Tuba

Finish—

Best suited for

📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

Mouthpiece B

Schilke S-H

• Tuba

Finish—

Best suited for

📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

Which is better?

Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Marcinkiewicz CH W1 details Schilke S-H details Marcinkiewicz CH W1 equivalents Schilke S-H equivalents

Marcinkiewicz CH W1 vs Schilke S-H

Playing Characteristics

What Do These Model Names Mean?

What Changes If You Switch?

Which is better?

Compare Marcinkiewicz CH W1 with others

Compare Schilke S-H with others

Popular Tuba comparisons

Marcinkiewicz vs Schilke

Browse by specification