Schilke 28 vs Schilke 31C2

The Schilke 31C2 has a wider cup diameter, the Schilke 28 has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Schilke 28
    • French Horn
    Cup diameter16.15 mm
    Cup depthMedium
    Rim width
    Throat diameter3.71 mm
    Backbore26
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    🎵All-round versatile — balanced cup for general playing
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Schilke 31C2
      • French Horn
      Cup diameter17.43 mm
      Cup depthMedium
      Rim width
      Throat diameter3.57 mm
      Backbore14
      Finish
      Material

      Cup Diameter

      The Schilke 31C2 has a cup diameter of 17.43 mm compared to 16.15 mm on the Schilke 28 — a difference of +1.28 mm. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      Both mouthpieces share a medium cup depth, so the sound character from depth alone will be very similar.

      Throat Diameter

      The Schilke 28 has a wider throat (3.71 mm vs 3.57 mm). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Schilke 28 details Schilke 31C2 details Schilke 28 equivalents Schilke 31C2 equivalents