Bruno Tilz 304- A 2 vs Schilke 51D

The Schilke 51D has a wider cup diameter, the Schilke 51D features a deeper cup, the Schilke 51D has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 304- A 2
    • Baritone / Euphonium
    Catalog
    Cup diameter23.00 mm
    Cup depthVery shallow
    Rim width
    Throat diameter4.60 mm
    Backbore
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Schilke 51D
      • Baritone / Euphonium
      Cup diameter25.55 mm
      Cup depthMedium
      Rim width
      Throat diameter7.04 mm
      BackboreJ .277"
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      The Schilke 51D has a cup diameter of 25.55 mm compared to 23.00 mm on the Bruno Tilz 304- A 2 — a difference of +2.55 mm. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      The Schilke 51D has a medium cup while the Bruno Tilz 304- A 2 has a very shallow cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Throat Diameter

      The Schilke 51D has a wider throat (7.04 mm vs 4.60 mm). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 304- A 2 details Schilke 51D details Bruno Tilz 304- A 2 equivalents Schilke 51D equivalents