Bruno Tilz 210-F 22 vs Yamaha FH-SHEW

The Yamaha FH-SHEW has a wider cup diameter, the Bruno Tilz 210-F 22 features a deeper cup, the Bruno Tilz 210-F 22 has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 210-F 22
    • Flugelhorn
    Catalog
    Cup diameter16.50 mm
    Cup depthDeep
    Rim width
    Throat diameter4.50 mm
    Backbore
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Yamaha FH-SHEW
      • Flugelhorn
      Cup diameter16.54 mm
      Cup depthMedium
      Rim width
      Throat diameter4.40 mm
      BackboreLong taper
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      🎵All-round versatile — balanced cup for general playing
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      The Yamaha FH-SHEW has a cup diameter of 16.54 mm compared to 16.50 mm on the Bruno Tilz 210-F 22 — a difference of +0.04 mm. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      The Bruno Tilz 210-F 22 has a deep cup while the Yamaha FH-SHEW has a medium cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Throat Diameter

      The Bruno Tilz 210-F 22 has a wider throat (4.50 mm vs 4.40 mm). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 210-F 22 details Yamaha FH-SHEW details Bruno Tilz 210-F 22 equivalents Yamaha FH-SHEW equivalents