Bach 14½D vs Bruno Tilz 213- T 2 1/2

The Bach 14½D has a wider cup diameter, the Bruno Tilz 213- T 2 1/2 features a deeper cup, the Bach 14½D has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Bach 14½D
    • Baritone / Euphonium
    Cup diameter24.50 mm / 0.9646 in
    Cup depthShallow
    Rim width
    Throat diameter5.85 mm / 0.2303 in
    Backbore
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Bruno Tilz 213- T 2 1/2
      • Baritone / Euphonium
      Catalog
      Cup diameter23.50 mm / 0.9252 in
      Cup depthDeep
      Rim width
      Throat diameter4.60 mm / 0.1811 in
      Backbore
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      The Bach 14½D has a cup diameter of 24.50 mm / 0.9646 in compared to 23.50 mm / 0.9252 in on the Bruno Tilz 213- T 2 1/2 — a difference of 1.00 mm / 0.0394 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      The Bruno Tilz 213- T 2 1/2 has a deep cup while the Bach 14½D has a shallow cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Throat Diameter

      The Bach 14½D has a wider throat (5.85 mm / 0.2303 in vs 4.60 mm / 0.1811 in). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bach 14½D details Bruno Tilz 213- T 2 1/2 details Bach 14½D equivalents Bruno Tilz 213- T 2 1/2 equivalents