Bach 18 vs Schilke 67

The Schilke 67 has a wider cup diameter, the Bach 18 has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Bach 18
    • Tuba
    Cup diameter32.10 mm / 1.2638 in
    Cup depthMedium
    Rim width
    Throat diameter9.00 mm / 0.3543 in
    Backbore
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Schilke 67
      • Tuba
      Cup diameter32.41 mm / 1.2760 in
      Cup depthMedium
      Rim width
      Throat diameter8.33 mm / 0.3280 in
      Backbore21/64.3281"
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      The Schilke 67 has a cup diameter of 32.41 mm / 1.2760 in compared to 32.10 mm / 1.2638 in on the Bach 18 — a difference of 0.31 mm / 0.0122 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      Both mouthpieces share a medium cup depth, so the sound character from depth alone will be very similar.

      Throat Diameter

      The Bach 18 has a wider throat (9.00 mm / 0.3543 in vs 8.33 mm / 0.3280 in). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bach 18 details Schilke 67 details Bach 18 equivalents Schilke 67 equivalents