Bruno Tilz 210-C 33 vs Bruno Tilz 210-S 12

The Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 has a wider cup diameter, the Bruno Tilz 210-C 33 has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 210-C 33
    • Flugelhorn
    Catalog
    Cup diameter16.80 mm / 0.6614 in
    Cup depthMedium
    Rim width
    Throat diameter4.50 mm / 0.1772 in
    Backbore
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Bruno Tilz 210-S 12
      • Flugelhorn
      Catalog
      Cup diameter17.00 mm / 0.6693 in
      Cup depth
      Rim width
      Throat diameter3.90 mm / 0.1535 in
      Backbore
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      The Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 has a cup diameter of 17.00 mm / 0.6693 in compared to 16.80 mm / 0.6614 in on the Bruno Tilz 210-C 33 — a difference of 0.20 mm / 0.0079 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Throat Diameter

      The Bruno Tilz 210-C 33 has a wider throat (4.50 mm / 0.1772 in vs 3.90 mm / 0.1535 in). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.

      Which is better?

      Both mouthpieces are categorized as "Catalog" — the physical dimensions above will determine which suits your embouchure and playing style better.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 210-C 33 details Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 details Bruno Tilz 210-C 33 equivalents Bruno Tilz 210-S 12 equivalents