Home › Flugelhorn › Bruno Tilz 210-S 5 E vs Denis Wick 4F

Bruno Tilz 210-S 5 E vs Denis Wick 4F

the Denis Wick 4F features a deeper cup, the Denis Wick 4F has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 210-S 5 E
    • Flugelhorn
    Catalog
    Cup diameter16.50 mm / 0.6496 in
    Cup depthMedium
    Rim width—
    Throat diameter3.50 mm / 0.1378 in
    Backbore—
    Finish—
    Material—
    Best suited for
    🎵All-round versatile — balanced cup for general playing
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Denis Wick 4F
      • Flugelhorn
      Cup diameter16.50 mm / 0.6496 in
      Cup depthVery deep
      Rim width5.17 mm / 0.2035 in
      Throat diameter4.58 mm / 0.1803 in
      Backboreopen
      Finish—
      Material—
      Best suited for
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      Both mouthpieces have virtually identical cup diameters at 16.50 mm / 0.6496 in.

      Cup Depth

      The Denis Wick 4F has a very deep cup while the Bruno Tilz 210-S 5 E has a medium cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.

      Throat Diameter

      The Denis Wick 4F has a wider throat (4.58 mm / 0.1803 in vs 3.50 mm / 0.1378 in). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.

      Which is better?

      Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 210-S 5 E details Denis Wick 4F details Bruno Tilz 210-S 5 E equivalents Denis Wick 4F equivalents

      Compare Bruno Tilz 210-S 5 E with others

      Compare Denis Wick 4F with others

      Popular Flugelhorn comparisons

      Bruno Tilz vs Denis Wick

      Browse by specification