Bruno Tilz 210-S 6 1/2 vs Denis Wick 2FL
the Denis Wick 2FL features a deeper cup, the Denis Wick 2FL has a larger throat opening.
Mouthpiece A
Bruno Tilz 210-S 6 1/2
• Flugelhorn
CatalogCup diameter17.00 mm / 0.6693 in
Cup depthDeep
Rim width—
Throat diameter3.50 mm / 0.1378 in
Backbore—
Finish—
Material—
Best suited for
Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
vs
Mouthpiece B
Denis Wick 2FL
• Flugelhorn
Cup diameter17.00 mm / 0.6693 in
Cup depthVery deep
Rim width4.92 mm / 0.1937 in
Throat diameter4.58 mm / 0.1803 in
Backboreopen
Finish—
Material—
Best suited for
Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
High-volume projection — open throat for power
Cup Diameter
Both mouthpieces have virtually identical cup diameters at 17.00 mm / 0.6693 in.
Cup Depth
The Denis Wick 2FL has a very deep cup while the Bruno Tilz 210-S 6 1/2 has a deep cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.
Throat Diameter
The Denis Wick 2FL has a wider throat (4.58 mm / 0.1803 in vs 3.50 mm / 0.1378 in). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.
Which is better?
Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.
Compare Bruno Tilz 210-S 6 1/2 with others
Compare Denis Wick 2FL with others
Popular Flugelhorn comparisons
- Denis Wick 2FL vs Denis Wick SFL
- Bruno Tilz 210-S 8 vs Marcinkiewicz 3FLS
- Denis Wick SFL vs Bach Mega Tone Flugel 1½C
- Denis Wick 5BFL vs Denis Wick SFL
- Denis Wick 2FL vs Curry 1 FLD
- Bruno Tilz 210-S 9 E vs Bob Reeves 43/F
- Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E vs Bruno Tilz 210-S 9 E
- Giardinelli 10FL vs Conn Precision 2 (Mello)