Bruno Tilz 210-S 7 1/2 vs Denis Wick 4F
The Bruno Tilz 210-S 7 1/2 has a wider cup diameter, the Denis Wick 4F features a deeper cup, the Denis Wick 4F has a larger throat opening.
Cup Diameter
The Bruno Tilz 210-S 7 1/2 has a cup diameter of 17.50 mm / 0.6890 in compared to 16.50 mm / 0.6496 in on the Denis Wick 4F — a difference of 1.00 mm / 0.0394 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.
Cup Depth
The Denis Wick 4F has a very deep cup while the Bruno Tilz 210-S 7 1/2 has a medium cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.
Throat Diameter
The Denis Wick 4F has a wider throat (4.58 mm / 0.1803 in vs 3.60 mm / 0.1417 in). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.
Which is better?
Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.
Compare Bruno Tilz 210-S 7 1/2 with others
Compare Denis Wick 4F with others
Popular Flugelhorn comparisons
- Denis Wick 2FL vs Denis Wick SFL
- Bruno Tilz 210-S 8 vs Marcinkiewicz 3FLS
- Denis Wick SFL vs Bach Mega Tone Flugel 1½C
- Denis Wick 5BFL vs Denis Wick SFL
- Denis Wick 2FL vs Curry 1 FLD
- Bruno Tilz 210-S 9 E vs Bob Reeves 43/F
- Giardinelli 10FL vs Conn Precision 2 (Mello)
- Bruno Tilz 210-S 4 E vs Bruno Tilz 210-S 9 E