Bruno Tilz 211-A 2 vs Schilke 30C2
The Schilke 30C2 has a wider cup diameter, the Schilke 30C2 features a deeper cup, the Bruno Tilz 211-A 2 has a larger throat opening.
Cup Diameter
The Schilke 30C2 has a cup diameter of 17.03 mm / 0.6705 in compared to 16.50 mm / 0.6496 in on the Bruno Tilz 211-A 2 — a difference of 0.53 mm / 0.0209 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.
Cup Depth
The Schilke 30C2 has a medium cup while the Bruno Tilz 211-A 2 has a very shallow cup. Deeper cups favor a darker, richer sound; shallower cups provide more brightness and easier upper register.
Throat Diameter
The Bruno Tilz 211-A 2 has a wider throat (3.60 mm / 0.1417 in vs 3.56 mm / 0.1402 in). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.
Which is better?
Neither mouthpiece clearly dominates the other — the right choice depends on your embouchure, playing style, and the sound you're after. Try both if possible.