Bruno Tilz 231-C 4 vs Bruno Tilz 310-M 0

The Bruno Tilz 310-M 0 has a wider cup diameter, the Bruno Tilz 310-M 0 has a larger throat opening.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 231-C 4
    • Tuba
    Catalog
    Cup diameter33.00 mm / 1.2992 in
    Cup depthDeep
    Rim width
    Throat diameter8.20 mm / 0.3228 in
    Backbore
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Bruno Tilz 310-M 0
      • Tuba
      Catalog
      Cup diameter33.70 mm / 1.3268 in
      Cup depthDeep
      Rim width
      Throat diameter8.30 mm / 0.3268 in
      Backbore
      Finish
      Material
      Best suited for
      🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
      📣High-volume projection — open throat for power

      Cup Diameter

      The Bruno Tilz 310-M 0 has a cup diameter of 33.70 mm / 1.3268 in compared to 33.00 mm / 1.2992 in on the Bruno Tilz 231-C 4 — a difference of 0.70 mm / 0.0276 in. A wider cup generally produces a fuller, darker tone but requires more air support.

      Cup Depth

      Both mouthpieces share a deep cup depth, so the sound character from depth alone will be very similar.

      Throat Diameter

      The Bruno Tilz 310-M 0 has a wider throat (8.30 mm / 0.3268 in vs 8.20 mm / 0.3228 in). A wider throat allows more air through, increasing volume and projection but reducing resistance.

      Which is better?

      Both mouthpieces are categorized as "Catalog" — the physical dimensions above will determine which suits your embouchure and playing style better.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 231-C 4 details Bruno Tilz 310-M 0 details Bruno Tilz 231-C 4 equivalents Bruno Tilz 310-M 0 equivalents