Bruno Tilz 231-C 4 vs Conn Imp. Precision 4

Both mouthpieces share similar core dimensions — the differences are in the details.

Overall Comparison Cup Diameter Cup Depth Rim Width Throat Diameter Backbore Finish Material
Mouthpiece A
    Bruno Tilz 231-C 4
    • Tuba
    Catalog
    Cup diameter33.00 mm / 1.2992 in
    Cup depthDeep
    Rim width
    Throat diameter8.20 mm / 0.3228 in
    Backbore
    Finish
    Material
    Best suited for
    🎻Orchestral playing — large cup for full, dark tone
    📣High-volume projection — open throat for power
    vs
    Mouthpiece B
      Conn Imp. Precision 4
      • Tuba
      General
      Cup diameter
      Cup depthDeep
      Rim width
      Throat diameter
      Backbore
      Finish
      MaterialSilver-plated brass
      Best suited for
      📋Small Eb bass
      🎶Full rich tone

      Cup Depth

      Both mouthpieces share a deep cup depth, so the sound character from depth alone will be very similar.

      Material

      The Bruno Tilz 231-C 4 is described as unspecified, and the Conn Imp. Precision 4 as Silver-plated brass. Material affects mass, warmth, and how quickly the piece responds.

      Which is better?

      The Bruno Tilz 231-C 4 is designed for catalog playing, while the Conn Imp. Precision 4 targets general use. Your best choice depends on your musical context.

      Open in interactive tool + Add third mouthpiece Bruno Tilz 231-C 4 details Conn Imp. Precision 4 details Bruno Tilz 231-C 4 equivalents Conn Imp. Precision 4 equivalents